STATE EX REL. HARRIS v. INDUS. COMM.

No. 83-1569.

12 Ohio St. 3d 152 (1984)

THE STATE, EX REL. HARRIS, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 25, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. David J. Boyd, for appellant.

Mr. Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Mr. Douglas M. Kennedy and Mr. Lee M. Smith, for appellee Industrial Commission.

Messrs. Dinsmore & Shohl and Mr. Kent W. Seifried, for appellee U.S. Playing Card Co.


Per Curiam.

It is well-established that mandamus will not lie to vacate an order of the commission unless that order constitutes an abuse of discretion. State, ex rel. Mees, v. Indus. Comm. (1972), 29 Ohio St.2d 128, 130 [58 O.O.2d 319]. The interpretation of a specific safety requirement is within the sound discretion of the commission and will not be overturned except where the record contains no evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases