IN RE CAITO

No. 883S291.

459 N.E.2d 1179 (1984)

In re Direct Contempt of Gus CAITO Concerning His Failure to Answer Questions before the Grand Jury of the Hamilton Court.

Supreme Court of Indiana.

Rehearing Denied April 19, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alex R. Voils, Jr., Owen M. Mullin, James Clark, Indianapolis, for appellant.

Linley E. Pearson, Atty. Gen., Richard Albert Alford, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellee.


OPINION ON CRIMINAL PETITION TO TRANSFER

GIVAN, Chief Justice.

Appellant brings this petition pursuant to Appellate Rule 4(A)(10) seeking a review of the Hamilton Circuit Court's finding him in direct contempt, and to challenge the constitutionality of Indiana's Grand Jury Use Immunity statute, IC § 35-34-2-8 [Burns Supp. 1983], as it applies to target witnesses.

Appellant was subpoenaed as a target...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases