1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 453 So.2d
  5. 453 So.2d 1183 (1984)
 

STATE v. FARDELMAN

No. 83-513.

453 So.2d 1183 (1984)

STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Paul R. FARDELMAN, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 9, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Mark C. Menser, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Steven W. Huss, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Health and Rehabilitative Services, Tallahassee, amicus curiae, for appellant.

Dan R. Warren, of Judge & Warren, P.A., Daytona Beach, for appellee.

DAUKSCH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order suppressing evidence of the results of an intoxilyzer test in a manslaughter case. An intoxilyzer is a device which measures blood/alcohol levels.

This case is like Drury v. Harding, 443 So.2d 360 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) and we are in agreement with the Drury ruling. Thus we must reverse the order of suppression. Appellee here also argues that the intoxilyzer device...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases