PER CURIAM.
Defendant appeals his conviction of arson in the second degree. He contends that the court erred in denying his motion to suppress and in requiring him to pay costs and restitution.
Defendant argues that his confession is inadmissible, because he did not freely and voluntarily waive his right to remain silent and that his confession was not voluntary. The trial court made findings which are supported by the evidence and concluded that defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
