ROSE v. STATE

No. 83-240.

450 So.2d 1173 (1984)

Charles ROSE, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Rehearing Denied June 15, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. Ford Duane of Robertson, Williams, Duane, Lewis & Ranson, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Sean Daly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

We find that the state adduced evidence sufficient to raise the statutory presumption of intent to defraud under section 713.34(3), Florida Statutes (1983).1 Accordingly, the case was properly submitted to the jury. State v. Ferrari, 398 So.2d 804 (Fla. 1981). Appellant's remaining arguments regarding fundamental error are without merit.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and SHARP...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases