UNITED STATES v. RUBIN

Civ. No. 83-K-1147.

590 F.Supp. 1029 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lloyd S. RUBIN a/k/a Stanley L. Rubin, individually, and doing business as Bay Hill Company, a nominee company, Transnational Corporation, A Colorado corporation, Transnational Management Corporation, A Colorado corporation, Transnational Realty Marketing Corporation, a/k/a Transnational Equity Trust, Ltd., A Colorado Corporation, Univest Financial Fund, Ltd. A Colorado corporation, Esther Bell, individually and as a shareholder of the above named Colorado corporations, Energy Capital Fund, Ltd., A Grand Cayman Islands corporation, Truman Bodden Company, A Grand Cayman Islands corporation, Caribhaven Service, Limited, A Grand Cayman Islands corporation, Northhaven Services, Limited, A Grand Cayman Islands corporation, Southhaven Services, Limited, A Grand Cayman Islands corporation, Defendant(s).

United States District Court, D. Colorado.

July 29, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Lengacher, James J. Brown, Judgment Enforcement Unit, Washington, D.C., and Linda Surbaugh, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for plaintiff.

Robert F. Hanley, Melanie Vogl, Denver, Colo., for Rubin.

Edwin S. Kahn, Denver, Colo., for Transnational Corp., Transnational Management Corp., Transnational Realty Marketing Corp., Univest Financial Fund, Ltd.

Michael P. Carey, Denver, Colo., for Esther Bell.

Joseph J. Bronesky, Denver, Colo., for Truman Bodden Co., Caribhaven Service, Ltd., Northhaven Services, Ltd., Southhaven Services, Ltd.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KANE, District Judge.

The United States initially sued Lloyd Rubin individually and a number of his alleged alter ego corporations, contending that Rubin fraudulently conveyed stock and other assets to his sister Esther Bell and his alter ego corporations to hinder the government in the collection of its judgment.1 Plaintiff alleged that the defendant corporations held all their assets in a constructive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases