PURVIS v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK

No. 83-184.

667 S.W.2d 936 (1984)

282 Ark. 102

M.B. PURVIS, Appellant, v. CITY OF LITTLE ROCK, Arkansas, La Quinta Motor Inns, Inc., Worthen Bank and Trust Company, N.A., Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

Rehearing Denied June 4, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harkey, Walmsley, Belew & Blankenship, Batesville, for appellant.

Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, for City of Little Rock, and Worthen Bank & Trust Company, N.A.

Rose Law Firm by George E. Campbell and Vincent Foster, Jr., and Judy B. Proctor, Little Rock, for La Quinta.


PURTLE, Justice.

The Pulaski County Chancery Court declared that the City of Little Rock properly authorized the issuance of $4,000,000 in "tourism bonds" to be used to finance construction of a La Quinta Motor Inn. In the decree the trial court upheld Act 380 of 1971.

On appeal it is urged that Act 380 of 1971 is governed by Amendment 49 to the Constitution of the State of Arkansas and that it was error for the court not to require Act 380 to be so controlled...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases