MARTIN v. LITTLE, BROWN & COMPANY, INC.

Civ. A. No. 83-4229.

590 F.Supp. 1004 (1984)

James L. MARTIN v. LITTLE, BROWN & COMPANY, INC.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

July 24, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. Martin, pro se.

Arnold Borish, Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

TROUTMAN, Senior District Judge.

Plaintiff, James L. Martin, a pro se litigant, claims to have performed certain work for the defendant for which he has not been paid. He seeks damages under either a contract or quasi-contract theory. The defendant, Little, Brown and Company, has moved to strike the complaint. It argues, inter alia, that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases