1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 676 P.2d
  5. 676 P.2d 916 (1984)
 

STATE v. HORSLEY

C 83-01-30455; CA A28746.

676 P.2d 916 (1984)

67 Or.App. 32

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Keith Darnell HORSLEY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 22, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carla D. Thompson, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Roy Pulvers, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and NEWMAN, J.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for robbery in the first degree after trial to the court without a jury. He contends that he was not advised of his right to have a jury and did not waive trial by jury in writing. He also claims error in the denial of his motion to suppress statements that he made to police officers and asserts that the sentence imposed was unconstitutional.

The state...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases