1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 9 Ohio
  5. 9 Ohio St. 3d 148 (1984)
 

CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS v. BOWERS

No. 83-792.

9 Ohio St. 3d 148 (1984)

CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, APPELLEE, v. BOWERS, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided February 15, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Gerald L. Pursley, director of law, and Mr. Daniel M. Colopy, prosecuting attorney, for appellee.

Messrs. Gurney, Miller & Mamone, Mr. Joseph A. Mamone and Mr. Jeffrey W. Brader, for appellant.

SWEENEY, J.

The question certified to this court by the court of appeals "is whether the provision in R.C. 2937.07 for an explanation of circumstances following a plea of no contest has been superseded by the enactment of Crim. R. 11."4 Additional issues concern whether the explanation of circumstances was sufficient even if the rule has not superseded the statute, and whether appellant's...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases