PLYMOUTH CITRUS PRODUCTS v. WOODARD

No. AU-24.

445 So.2d 1130 (1984)

PLYMOUTH CITRUS PRODUCTS, a Self-Insured, and Corporate Group Service, a Servicing Agent, Appellants, v. Sarah WOODARD and Department of Labor and Employment Security, Division of Workers' Compensation, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Cantrell of Miller & Cooper, Orlando, for appellants.

Edward H. Hurt of Hurt & Parrish, Bill McCabe of Shepherd, McCabe & Cooley, Orlando, for appellee.


PER CURIAM.

The employer/carrier appeal a compensation order awarding wage loss benefits, contending that the claimant's wage loss was not a result of her compensable injury. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

There was competent substantial evidence that the claimant's inability to perform the work offered her from October 22, 1982, through December 12, 1982, was the result of her industrial injury. Accordingly, the award of wage loss benefits for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases