STATE v. BARMON

No. 20-791; CA A23867.

679 P.2d 888 (1984)

67 Or.App. 369

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Harry Mitchell BARMON, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon In Banc.

Resubmitted June 8, 1983.

Decided March 14, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied May 4, 1984.

Review Denied May 22, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Sepenuk, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was James L. Collins, Portland.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.


Resubmitted In Banc June 8, 1983.

NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his convictions for rape in the first degree, sexual abuse in the second degree and burglary in the first degree. He assigns as errors that the trial court (1) provided written answers to jury questions in the absence of defendant and his counsel and without notice to them and (2) ruled that statements that defendant made to Detective Schultze of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases