Per Curiam.
The respondent was admitted to practice by the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, on June 18, 1962. In this proceeding to discipline respondent for professional misconduct, both the petitioner and respondent move to confirm in part and disaffirm in part the report of the special referee.
There were 13 charges of misconduct alleged in the petition. The special referee sustained charges 3, 4, 5, 9, 10 and 11 and failed to sustain...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
