1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 152 Cal.App.3d
  5. 152 Cal.App.3d 1 (1984)
 

THEROUX v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Docket No. 68469.

152 Cal.App.3d 1 (1984)

199 Cal. Rptr. 264

MARY THEROUX et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Two.

February 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, N. Eugene Hill, Assistant Attorney General, and Talmadge R. Jones, Deputy Attorney General, for Defendants and Appellants.

Tanzer, Rosato, Samuels & Weisz, Lowell R. Wedemeyer and Barry M. Weisz for Plaintiffs and Respondents.

OPINION

GATES, J.

Defendants State of California and State Controller Ken Cory appeal from the judgment entered in favor of Mary Theroux, Susan Balliger and Christine Morales contending: "[I.] The exclusion of respondents from Senate Bill 91 [SB 91] does not violate constitutional due process or equal protection provisions. [II.] The State Controller cannot disburse state monies contrary to the legislative purpose of Senate Bill 91...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases