CHALLENGE MACHINERY CO. v. MATTISON MACHINE WORKS

Docket No. 69470.

138 Mich. App. 15 (1984)

359 N.W.2d 232

CHALLENGE MACHINERY COMPANY v. MATTISON MACHINE WORKS

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided October 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt & Howlett (by Dennis C. Kolenda), for plaintiff.

Warner, Norcross & Judd (by Roger M. Clark and Patrick E. Mears), for Mattison Machine Works.

Nelson & Kreuger, P.C. (by Steven L. Kreuger), for J. Lee Hackett Company.

Before: BEASLEY, P.J., and ALLEN and M.B. BREIGHNER, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff, The Challenge Machinery Company, appeals by leave granted from the December 30, 1982, order which granted defendants' motions for summary judgment and dismissed counts I-IV of Challenge's complaint. Defendant Mattison Machine Works cross-appeals from that portion of the order which denied its motion for summary judgment on count V of the complaint.

Challenge is a manufacturer of precision parts. Mattison manufactures the large machines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases