IN RE GOLD


98 N.J. 53 (1984)

484 A.2d 10

IN THE MATTER OF MICHAEL GOLD, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided December 3, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robyn M. Hill argued the cause on behalf of the Office of Attorney Ethics.

No appearance was made on behalf of the respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary proceeding arises out of a motion by the Office of Attorney Ethics for final disciplinary action. The motion is based on respondent's guilty pleas to two separate counts of misapplication of entrusted property under N.J.S.A. 2C:21-15.

I

The Decision and Recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB) accurately sets forth the following relevant facts:

On July 14, 1981, a Hunterdon County Grand Jury...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases