1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 599 F.Supp.
  5. 599 F.Supp. 902 (1984)
 

FRIEDMAN, EISENSTEIN, RAEMER & SCHWARTZ v. AFTERMAN

No. 83 C 9609.

599 F.Supp. 902 (1984)

FRIEDMAN, EISENSTEIN, RAEMER & SCHWARTZ, a partnership, Practice Development Institute Ltd., an Illinois corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Allan B. AFTERMAN, The CPA Consulting Group, Ltd., an Illinois corporation, and Donald W. Bernard, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

December 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leonard A. Nelson, Schoenberg, Fisher & Newman, Ltd., Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Sherwin D. Abrams, Terry G. Chapman, Abrams, Rifkin & Chapman, Chicago, Ill., for defendants.

ORDER

BUA, District Judge.

Before the Court is defendants' motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim and lack of subject matter jurisdiction. For the reasons stated herein, defendants' motion is denied.

In considering a motion to dismiss, the Court must accept all well-pleaded material facts as true and must make all reasonable inferences in a light most favorable to the plaintiff. City of Milwaukee v. Saxbe,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases