1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 735 F.2d
  5. 735 F.2d 763 (1984)
 

NASCONE v. SPUDNUTS, INC.

No. 83-5602.

735 F.2d 763 (1984)

Frank J. NASCONE, and Spudnuts of Pennsylvania, Inc., a corporation, Appellants, v. SPUDNUTS, INC., a corporation, and Frank Boyd, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided June 1, 1984.

As Amended June 26, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stanley Yorsz (argued), Thomas M. Thompson, Buchanan & Ingersoll, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellants.

P. Christian Hague (argued), Jonathan D. Bonime, Meyer, Unkovic & Scott, Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellees.

Before HUNTER and BECKER, Circuit Judges, and KATZ, District Judge.

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Circuit Judge.

Frank Nascone, a Pittsburgh-based franchisee of Spudnuts, a Utah-based fast food franchisor, appeals from an order of the district court for the Western District of Pennsylvania transferring this diversity and antitrust action to the District of Utah because of a forum selection clause in a franchise agreement that the court found to be applicable to the case and reasonable in scope and content. Nascone advances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases