STATE v. KING

No. 84AP-979.

20 Ohio App. 3d 126 (1984)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. KING, APPELLANT.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Franklin County.

Decided December 31, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Miller, prosecuting attorney, and Alan C. Travis, for appellee.

Richard F. King, pro se.


NORRIS, J.

Defendant, in his motion for leave to file a delayed appeal and for assignment of counsel, filed in affidavit form, requests this court to waive the requirement of App. R. 5(A) that he set forth the errors which he claims were made by the trial court, for the reason that he is a layman who is unable to articulate those errors. In an effort to comply with the requirement of the rule that he set forth the reasons for his failure to perfect an appeal, defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases