1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 581 F.Supp.
  5. 581 F.Supp. 878 (1984)
 

McFARLAND v. MEMOREX CORP.

Nos. C-79-2007-WAI, C-79-2926-WAI and C-80-0241-WAI.

581 F.Supp. 878 (1984)

Craig T. McFARLAND, et al., Plaintiffs, v. MEMOREX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

January 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Michael Brennan, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, Newport Beach, Cal., Barry P. Goode, McCutchen, Doyle, Brown & Enersen, Douglas M. Schwab, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, San Francisco, Cal., Mitchell A. Kramer, Steven Kapustin, Philadelphia, Pa., Kenneth R. Logan, Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett, New York City, for defendants.

John W. Allured, Law Offices of David B. Gold, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs.

ORDER

INGRAM, District Judge.

Plaintiffs request that this court reconsider its decision in McFarland v. Memorex, 493 F.Supp. 631 (N.D.Cal.1980) in light of recent Ninth Circuit authority and a recent order of this court. At issue is the viability of a claim for relief under section 12(2) of the 1933 Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77l(2), against defendants Memorex Corporation and its president, Robert...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases