ARMSTRONG v. SAIF CORP.

No. 80-01476; CA A26582.

678 P.2d 777 (1984)

67 Or.App. 498

In the matter of the Compensation of Ray ARMSTRONG, Claimant. Ray Armstrong, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 28, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. Udziela, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Pozzi, Wilson, Atchison, O'Leary & Conboy, Portland.

Darrell E. Bewley, Appellate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund Corp., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief was Donna M. Parton, Associate Appellate Counsel, State Acc. Ins. Fund Corp., Salem.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and WARDEN and YOUNG, JJ.


YOUNG, Judge.

Claimant seeks reversal of a "republished" order of the Workers' Compensation Board denying his aggravation claim. He urges that the Board should have remanded the case to the referee for the taking of additional evidence. Respondent moves to dismiss on the ground that we lack jurisdiction. We deny the motion to dismiss and reverse and remand to the Board.

We have written two previous opinions on this claim. Armstrong v. SAIF, ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases