MATTESON v. HARPER

Nos. A8202-00761; A27119; S30332.

682 P.2d 766 (1984)

297 Or. 113

John L. MATTESON, Petitioner On review, v. Malcolm L. HARPER, Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided May 15, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leslie M. Roberts, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With her on the petition and brief were Rex Armstrong and Kell, Alterman & Runstein, Portland.

J.P. Graff, Portland, argued the cause for respondent on review. With him on the response to the petition for review and briefs was Schwabe, Williamson, Wyatt, Moore & Roberts, Portland.


JONES, Justice.

Plaintiff sued defendant for conversion of collateral in which plaintiff had a perfected security interest.1 The trial court granted summary judgment for plaintiff in the amount of $17,000, representing the fair market value of the equipment on the date of the conversion. The Court of Appeals reversed, holding that the entrustment provision of Article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, ORS 72.4030(3),2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases