HONG v. KONG

No. 9092.

675 P.2d 769 (1984)

Karen N.H.L. HONG, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lily L.H. KONG and Ivan F.S. Kong, Defendants-Appellants.

Supreme Court of Hawaii.

January 17, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anson O. Rego, Waianae, for defendants-appellants Kong.

Harold W. Goble, Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellee Hong.

Before LUM, C.J., and NAKAMURA, PADGETT, HAYASHI and WAKATSUKI, JJ.


PADGETT, Justice.

This is an appeal in a civil case which was tried, jury-waived, and in which findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered.

In this case, the opening brief of the appellants does not attach the findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 3(b)(4), Hawaii Supreme Court Rules (HSCR) nor does the brief quote the findings and conclusions complained of in the points of error as required by HSCR Rule 3(b)(5).

HSCR...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases