1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 728 F.2d
  5. 728 F.2d 712 (1984)
 

HOWARD v. FORTENBERRY

No. 83-4207.

728 F.2d 712 (1984)

Neola N. HOWARD, Etc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Ray FORTENBERRY, Etc., et al., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

March 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raymond L. Cannon, Tallulah, La., for plaintiffs-appellants.

Charles E. Welsh, Asst. Atty. Gen., Shreveport, La., for Gov. Treen, Director of Corrections and HHR.

Voelker, Ragland, Brackin & Crigler, William B. Ragland, Jr., Lake Providence, La., for East Carroll Parish Police Jury & Members Thereof.

Mayer, Smith & Roberts, Paul B. Mayer, Shreveport, La., for Hartford Fire Ins. Co.

Cook, Yancey, King & Galloway, Hershel E. Richard, Jr., Shreveport, La., for Aetna Cas. & Surety Co.

Before RUBIN and RANDALL, Circuit Judges, and MITCHELL, District Judge.

ON PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

PER CURIAM:

The plaintiffs seek rehearing on the basis that there was some evidence that individual police jurors (other than those on the Prison Board) must have seen the isolation cells on visits to the institution. Responsibility for administering the Prison Farm was delegated to the Prison Board and, by it, to the Superintendent. The statements about a few police jurors, made in depositions of others, are insufficient to attribute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases