1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 589 F.Supp.
  5. 589 F.Supp. 831 (1984)
 

LEICHIHMAN v. PICKWICK INTERN., INC.

No. Civ. 3-82-1121.

589 F.Supp. 831 (1984)

Mony LEICHIHMAN, Plaintiff, v. PICKWICK INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

August 15, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Refsell, Doherty, Rumble & Butler, Minneapolis, Minn., and Marcus R. Magnuson, James F. Dunn & Associates, St. Paul, Minn., for plaintiff.

Jon P. Parrington and Joel Muscoplat, Pustorino & Pederson, Edina, Minn., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

DEVITT, Senior District Judge.

Before the court is defendant Pickwick's motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or, in the alternative, for new trial. The standard for granting a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is a high one. The court is merely to decide the legal question whether there was evidence sufficient to create material fact issues for the jury. The court cannot decide those fact issues if they are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases