WITTEN v. MURPHY

8589; CA A27786.

692 P.2d 715 (1984)

71 Or.App. 511

In the matter of the Application of Marjorie WITTEN, Walter L. Shrofe, Betty J. Shrofe, William T. Smith and Jack Carl for a Way of Necessity. Marjorie Witten, Walter L. Shrofe, Betty J. Shrofe, William T. Smith and Jack Carl, Respondents, v. Phillip MURPHY and Giannina Murphy, Husband and Wife, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 19, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied February 8, 1985.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Milo Pope, Mount Vernon, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Kilpatricks & Pope, Mount Vernon.

Hugh K. Cole, Jr., Eugene, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before GILLETTE, P.J., and YOUNG and ROSSMAN, JJ.


YOUNG, Judge.

This is a proceeding to establish a statutory way of necessity. ORS 376.150-376.200. The county court granted petitioners a way across defendants' land.1 The Circuit Court affirmed, ORS 376.175(4), and defendants appeal. The question is whether petitioners have carried their burden to show that they have no "existing enforceable access to a public road," 376.180(8), and that they could not "acquire an easement for access...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases