PER CURIAM.
Having examined the record before us we conclude that the trial court did not err in granting a summary judgment premised upon a determination that the appellant's action was barred by the applicable statute of limitation, § 95.11(3)(j), Fla. Stat. (1979). See Steiner v. Ciba Geigy Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.