1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 726 F.2d
  5. 726 F.2d 631 (1984)
 

SLAYTON v. WILLINGHAM

No. 82-2109.

726 F.2d 631 (1984)

Cecil D. SLAYTON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. David WILLINGHAM, Larry Hignight, Bill Cully, City of Ardmore, Oklahoma, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

January 27, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cecil D. Slayton, pro se.

Joseph A. Sharp, Jack M. Thomas, and Walter D. Haskins of Best, Sharp, Thomas, Glass & Atkinson, Tulsa, Okl., for defendants-appellees.

Before SETH, Chief Judge, and McKAY and LOGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Cecil Slayton appeals from summary judgment in his civil rights suit. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and 56. He brought this suit under section...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases