1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 668 S.W.2d
  5. 668 S.W.2d 686 (1984)
 

LEISSNER v. SCHOTT

No. C-2641.

668 S.W.2d 686 (1984)

B.E. LEISSNER, Petitioner, v. Louis SCHOTT, III, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Texas.

February 8, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cole, McManus, Cole & Easley, James Cole, Victoria, for petitioner.

Woody, Gumm, Hoffman & Heintz, Larry D. Woody, Victoria, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

B.E. Leissner filed suit against Louis Schott, III, under the Deceptive Trade Practices — Consumer Protection Act. TEX.BUS. & COM.CODE ANN. §§ 17.41-.63 (Vernon Supp.1982). The jury found no violation of the DTPA, but did find that Leissner's suit was brought in bad faith and for the purpose of harassment. The trial court, however, did not award Schott his attorney's fees, because the court did not find that Leissner's suit was groundless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases