U.S. v. 137 DRAW POKER-TYPE MACHINES & 6 SLOT MACH.

No. C83-2670.

606 F.Supp. 747 (1984)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. ONE HUNDRED THIRTY-SEVEN (137) DRAW POKER-TYPE MACHINES AND SIX (6) SLOT MACHINES, Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, E.D.

March 14, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emily M. Mirsky, Asst. U.S. Atty., Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

William L. Summers, Summers, Potts, Kampinski, Tittle & White, Cleveland, Ohio, for Walter Lazuka and Walter Music and Vending Co., Inc.

Neil R. Wilson, Asst. Law Director, City of Mentor, Lake County, Ohio, for City of Mentor.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

MANOS, District Judge.

On June 27, 1983, plaintiff, the United States of America, filed a complaint in forfeiture against one hundred thirty-seven (137) draw poker-type machines and six (6) slot machines. The government contends that these machines are gambling devices as defined in 15 U.S.C. § 1171 and subject to forfeiture to the United States under 15 U.S.C. §§ 1172, 1173(a)(3), and 1177. The case is currently before...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases