NW PAC. INDEM. v. JUNCTION CITY WATER DIST.

No. 16-79-09299; CA A22583; SC 29362.

677 P.2d 671 (1984)

296 Or. 365

NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Oregon Corporation, Respondent On Rehearing/Petitioner On Review, v. JUNCTION CITY WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, Petitioner On Rehearing/Respondent On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

February 8, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall Bryson, and Calkins & Calkins and Bryson & Bryson, Eugene, for petitioner on rehearing.

Daniel M. Holland and Jaqua, Wheatley, Gallagher & Holland, P.C., Eugene, for respondent on rehearing.


LENT, Justice.

Defendant has filed a petition for rehearing, to which plaintiff has, pursuant to our request, filed a response. The thrust of the petition for rehearing is that even if our decision that there was an indemnity agreement between the parties was correct, plaintiff was not entitled to a directed verdict, as we held in our former opinion. NW Pac. Indem. v. Junction City Water Dist., 295 Or. 553, 558,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases