1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 453 So.2d
  5. 453 So.2d 890 (1984)
 

LAYNE & BRILL v. BRILL

Nos. 84-699, 84-700.

453 So.2d 890 (1984)

LAYNE & BRILL, P.A.; Layne & Brill Properties, Inc.; Layne & Brill, North Carolina Properties, Inc.; Franklin Title Services, Inc.; Richard Bernstein; and B.J. Layne, Appellants, v. Herbert L. BRILL, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

August 7, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Koeppel, Miami, for appellants.

Payton & Rachlin and Guy W. Turner, Miami, for appellee.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Stripped of immaterial factual considerations, this appeal raises a single question of law, i.e., whether a court may enter an injunction without prior notice of a hearing for that purpose, without factual findings in support of an injunction, and without providing for posting of a bond or setting forth reasons for waiving the bond requirement. We hold that it may not, on authority of Hotelerama Associates, Ltd. v. Bystrom,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases