1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 157 Cal.App.3d
  5. 157 Cal.App.3d 1184 (1984)
 

BATTRAM v. EMERALD BAY COMMUNITY ASSN.

Docket No. 30469.

157 Cal.App.3d 1184 (1984)

204 Cal. Rptr. 107

KENNETH I. BATTRAM et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v. EMERALD BAY COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION, Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent; EMERALD BAY CC & R COMMITTEE, Defendant and Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Three.

June 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Call, Clayton & Jensen, Call & Clayton and Wayne W. Call for Defendant and Appellant.

Mirassou & Nyznyk and J.B. Mirassou for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Goebel & Monaghan and Louis E. Goebel for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent.

OPINION

SONENSHINE, J.

The facts are not in dispute. Emerald Bay is a private self-contained community of over 500 homes. There are 11 tracts in the community, subject to virtually identical covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs). The Emerald Bay Community Association (Association) administers the rights and obligations created by all the CC&Rs and establishes a fiscal year budget, funded by imposing homeowner fees...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases