1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 678 P.2d
  5. 678 P.2d 661 (1984)
 

McMAHON v. ANACONDA CO.

No. 81-34.

678 P.2d 661 (1984)

George D. McMAHON, Claimant and Appellant, v. The ANACONDA COMPANY, Employer, and The Anaconda Company, Defendant and Respondent.

Supreme Court of Montana.

Submitted February 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Cruikshank, III (argued), Great Falls, for claimant and appellant.

Waite, Schuster & Larson; Richard Larson (argued), Great Falls, for defendant and respondent.

MORRISON, Justice.

George D. McMahon (claimant) appeals from orders of the Workers' Compensation Court denying benefits under the Occupational Disease Act and the Workers' Compensation Act. Claimant sought benefits under both Acts simultaneously in separate proceedings. The two cases have been consolidated for purposes of appeal. We remand for further proceedings.

Claimant worked at the Anaconda Company's copper refinery in Great Falls from 1956 through December...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases