HANCOCK v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INS. CO.

No. 83-80.

472 A.2d 867 (1984)

Talmadge HANCOCK, Appellant, v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

February 2, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Craig Dean Katz, Washington, D.C., for appellant.

David F. Grimaldi, Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before NEBEKER, PRYOR and TERRY, Associate Judges, in chambers.


NEBEKER, Associate Judge:

Appellant Hancock challenges a trial court ruling awarding him a sum of money under a disability insurance contract. He has been granted leave to proceed with his appeal in forma pauperis. His attorney has filed a motion for leave to withdraw; appellee, Mutual of Omaha, has filed a motion to dismiss; and appellant has filed a pro se request that he receive a transcript of the trial court proceedings at government expense. We grant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases