1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 162 Cal.App.3d
  5. 162 Cal.App.3d 1174 (1984)
 

SADE SHOE CO. v. OSCHIN & SNYDER

Docket No. B002159.

162 Cal.App.3d 1174 (1984)

209 Cal. Rptr. 124

SADE SHOE COMPANY, INC., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. OSCHIN AND SNYDER, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

December 20, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Kehr, DeMeter, Factor & Herman and Richard K. Kudo for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Rubin & Rahe and Ken Nathanson for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

LILLIE, P.J.

(1) (See fn. 1.) Plaintiff, Sade Shoe Company, Inc., appeals from judgment dismissing its action as to defendant Oschin and Snyder entered after the trial court sustained defendant's demurrer to the first amended complaint without leave to amend.1 (Code Civ. Proc., § 581, subd. 3.)

The first amended complaint sought compensatory and punitive damages for interference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases