ROSADO v. PROCTOR & SCHWARTZ


106 A.D.2d 27 (1984)

Hector Rosado, Plaintiff, v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Comet Fibers, Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 27, 1984


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Irwin H. Haut of counsel (Morris, Duffy, Ivone & Jensen, attorneys), for defendant and third-party plaintiff-appellant.

Anne Flanagan of counsel (Eileen Eglin and Michael N. Stevens with her on the brief; Wilson, Elser, Edelman & Dicker, attorneys), for third-party defendant-respondent.

SANDLER, J. P., concurs with FEIN, J.; SILVERMAN, J., concurs in an opinion; KASSAL, J., dissents in a separate opinion.


FEIN, J.

The facts are fairly stated in the dissent.

It is conceded that no claim for contribution is now available. Any such claim, founded upon negligence, has been extinguished by reason of the settlement of plaintiff's claims against the third-party defendant (Comet) and the third-party plaintiff (Proctor) (General Obligations Law, § 15-108, subds [b], [c]; McDermott v City of New York, 50 N.Y.2d 211

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases