1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 598 F.Supp.
  5. 598 F.Supp. 724 (1984)
 

WEISMAN v. RIVLIN

Civ. A. No. 84-2614.

598 F.Supp. 724 (1984)

Peter WEISMAN, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Lewis A. RIVLIN, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

November 29, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip J. Hirschkop, Bernard J. DiMuro, Alexandria, Va., for plaintiffs.

Philip L. Cohan, Michael A. Schlanger, John R. Metz, Washington, D.C., for defendants Rivlin and New Venture Capital Corp.

John T. Coyne, Washington, D.C., for defendant Peabody, Lambert & Meyers.

MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on the motion of defendants Rivlin and New Venture Capital Corporation to impose sanctions on plaintiffs under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for filing the complaint in this case when on its face it disclosed a lack of diversity jurisdiction. After dismissing the complaint, the Court heard the arguments of counsel with respect to sanctions and has considered the entire record...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases