HEATHMAN v. PAR-4, INC.

No. A28204-02099; CA A29499.

684 P.2d 630 (1984)

69 Or.App. 252

Dwayne HEATHMAN, Respondent, v. PAR-4, INC., Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank M. Parisi, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Spears, Lubersky, Campbell, Bledsoe, Anderson & Young, Portland.

Irving W. Potter, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Frank Josselson and Josselson & Potter, Portland.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

In this action for declaratory relief, in which plaintiff sought a declaration of the rights of the parties under a contract, it is clear from the pleadings that the parties disagree on the meaning of the contract. At the close of plaintiff's case, defendant moved to dismiss the action under ORCP 54 B(2). The denial of that motion is the only error assigned on appeal.

Even though we might disagree with the trial court's interpretation of the contract...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases