1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 621 F.Supp.
  5. 621 F.Supp. 689 (1984)
 

ESTEE LAUDER, INC. v. HARCO GRAPHICS, INC.

No. 82 Civ. 8188 (CBM).

621 F.Supp. 689 (1984)

ESTEE LAUDER, INC., Plaintiff, v. HARCO GRAPHICS, INC., Harry Aronson, and Perry Printing Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 21, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hendler & Murray by Michael Maillet, New York City, for plaintiff.

Lankenau Kovner & Bickford by John C. Lankenau, New York City, for defendant Perry Printing Corp.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

MOTLEY, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff Estee Lauder, Inc. (Estee Lauder) has brought this action charging three defendants with violating the civil provisions of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961 et seq., as well as with common law fraud. Specifically, Estee Lauder has charged defendants Harco Graphics (Harco), Harry Aronson (Aronson) and Perry Printing (Perry) with engaging in a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases