STATE v. NORMAN

No. C82-07-36456; CA A28001.

674 P.2d 626 (1984)

66 Or.App. 443

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Garland Lee NORMAN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 11, 1984.

Reconsideration Denied February 24, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin W. Van Zeipel, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for appellant.

Jan Peter Londahl, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and James E. Mountain, Jr., Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J. and VAN HOOMISSEN and NEWMAN, JJ.


VAN HOOMISSEN, Judge.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance (heroin). ORS 475.992. He contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence seized during a warrantless search of his person. The issue is whether the police had probable cause to arrest defendant before he was searched. Defendant concedes that if the arrest was valid the search incident to that arrest was valid. He has not raised any issue...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases