1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 156 Cal.App.3d
  5. 156 Cal.App.3d 1137 (1984)
 

CITY OF FRESNO v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. F003641.

156 Cal.App.3d 1137 (1984)

202 Cal. Rptr. 313

CITY OF FRESNO, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF FRESNO COUNTY, Respondent; TAXPAYERS ASSOCIATION OF FRESNO COUNTY et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

May 10, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

James A. McKelvey, City Attorney, and C. William Brewer, Assistant City Attorney, for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Andrews, Andrews, Thaxter & Jones, Richard D. Andrews and Stephen A. Hansen for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

BROWN (G.A.), P.J.

The central issue in this proceeding is whether an ordinance enacted by the City of Fresno (City) violates article XIII A (Proposition 13) of the California Constitution limiting the amount of property taxes that may be assessed. The trial court held that the tax is invalid. We disagree.

On August 16, 1983, the City enacted City of Fresno Ordinance No. 83-1161 which imposed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases