1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 584 F.Supp.
  5. 584 F.Supp. 690 (1984)
 

SMALL v. CHEMLAWN CORP.

No. G82-132 CA.

584 F.Supp. 690 (1984)

Richard SMALL, Freddie Cox, and Floyd R. Mann, Plaintiffs, v. CHEMLAWN CORPORATION, Defendant.

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, S.D.

April 11, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anderson, Green & Vincent by Adrian R. Vincent, Lansing, Mich., for plaintiff Floyd R. Mann.

Sablich, Ryan, Bobay & Pollok by Steven J. Pollok, Lansing, Mich., for plaintiffs Small and Cox.

Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone by John D. Pirich and Brian A. Kaser, Lansing, Mich., for defendant.

OPINION RE POST-TRIAL MOTIONS

HILLMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Freddie Cox and Richard Small were employed as lawn care specialists by defendant ChemLawn Corporation. Plaintiff Floyd R. Mann was also employed by defendant ChemLawn as manager of the company's Lansing office. Mann was the immediate supervisor of Small and Cox. On March 23, 1981, the employment relationship between all three plaintiffs and ChemLawn was terminated. Plaintiffs claim that they...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases