ALASKA BUSSELL ELEC. v. VERN HICKEL CONST.

No. 7727/7762.

688 P.2d 576 (1984)

ALASKA BUSSELL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. VERN HICKEL CONSTRUCTION CO., Appellee/Cross-Appellant.

Supreme Court of Alaska.

As Modified on Rehearing, September 7, 1984; Rehearing Denied in All Other Respects.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. Craig Schmidt, William M. Bankston, Bankston & McCollum, Anchorage, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Joseph N. Barcott and Jermain, Dunnagan & Owen, Anchorage, for appellee/cross-appellant.

Before BURKE, C.J., and RABINOWITZ, MATTHEWS, COMPTON and MOORE, JJ.


OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

Alaska Bussell Electric Company (Bussell) appeals the judgment of the superior court entered pursuant to the special jury verdict. The jury held that Bussell was liable to Vern Hickel Construction (Hickel) on a theory of promissory estoppel for refusing to perform according to the terms of Bussell's bid. Hickel cross-appeals the trial court's judgment awarding Hickel less than the requested measure of damages. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases