1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 595 F.Supp.
  5. 595 F.Supp. 668 (1984)
 

HOPPER v. TIMEX CORP.

No. LR-C-84-347.

595 F.Supp. 668 (1984)

Edward HOPPER v. TIMEX CORPORATION.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, W.D.

September 28, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert K. McCalla and Howard Shapiro of McCalla, Thompson, Pyburn & Ridley, New Orleans, La., Kathlyn Graves of Wright, Lindsey & Jennings, Little Rock, Ark., for defendant.

Philip E. Kaplan and Karen L. Arndt of Kaplan, Brewer & Miller, Little Rock, Ark., for plaintiffs.

ORDER

ROY, District Judge.

Pending before the Court is the motion of the defendant for summary judgment dismissing class action allegations. Defendant asserts that the undisputed material facts demonstrate plaintiff has abused the judicial process and that plaintiff cannot represent a class of similarly situated employees who were allegedly separated from employment. The plaintiff has responded and defendant replied. The matter is now ripe for determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases