CIVIL SERV. BD. OF PORTLAND v. BUR. OF LABOR

No. 4-79, CA A20231, SC 29359.

692 P.2d 569 (1984)

298 Or. 307

CIVIL SERVICE BOARD OF THE CITY OF PORTLAND, Respondent On Review, v. BUREAU OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIES, Mary Wendy Roberts, Commissioner, Petitioner On Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided December 11, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Nessly, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for petitioner on review. With him on the briefs were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Stanton F. Long, Deputy Atty. Gen., and William F. Gary, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Richard A. Braman, Deputy City Atty., Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent on review.


CARSON, Justice.

The Bureau of Labor and Industries (Bureau)1 petitioned for review of a decision of the Court of Appeals that set aside a part of the order of the Commissioner of the Bureau (the Commissioner) directed to respondent, the Civil Service Board of the City of Portland (Employer).2 The Court of Appeals held that the Commissioner had erroneously interpreted a provision of law in her determination...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases