STATE v. DECENSO

No. 8764.

681 P.2d 573 (1984)

STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellee, Cross-Appellant, v. Fred Albert DECENSO, Defendant-Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii.

April 3, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Bettencourt, Honolulu, for defendant-appellant, cross-appellee.

Peter Esser, Deputy Pros. Atty., Honolulu (Arthur E. Ross, Deputy Pros. Atty., Honolulu, on the brief), for plaintiff-appellee, cross-appellant.

Before BURNS, C.J., and HEEN and TANAKA, JJ.


BURNS, Chief Judge.

Defendant Fred Albert DeCenso (DeCenso) appeals from a jury conviction of sex abuse in the first degree.1 He alleges that the lower court erred in: 1) admitting into evidence items seized from him; 2) admitting into evidence the complainant's identification of him; and 3) refusing to allow him to call the complainant as his own witness. We affirm.

The State of Hawaii...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases