1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 11 Ohio
  5. 11 Ohio St. 3d 114 (1984)
 

ZANCO, INC. v. MICHIGAN MUT. INS. CO.

No. 83-1278.

11 Ohio St. 3d 114 (1984)

ZANCO, INC., APPELLANT, v. MICHIGAN MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided June 13, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., Mr. Martin J. Murphy and Mr. Paul D. Eklund, for appellant.

Mansour, Gavin, Gerlack & Manos Co., L.P.A., Mr. Julius R. Gerlack and Mr. Jeffrey L. Tasse, for appellee.

Per Curiam.

In its first proposition of law, Zanco argues that an insurer owes a duty to defend its insured if the pleading against the insured contains allegations which are vague, ambiguous, nebulous or incomplete such that a potential for coverage exists. This rule has recently been adopted in Ohio. In Willoughby Hills v. Cincinnati Ins. Co. (1984), 9 Ohio St.3d 177, this court held that "[w]here...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases