SNELL v. G.D. SEARLE & CO.

Civ. A. No. 81-AR-0983-S.

595 F.Supp. 654 (1984)

Nancy SNELL and Timothy A. Snell, Plaintiffs, v. G.D. SEARLE & CO., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Alabama, S.D.

On Motion to Dismiss October 10, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. Gordon Pate, Hare, Wynn, Newell & Newton, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiffs.

Lawrence B. Clark, Augusta S. Dowd, Lange, Simpson, Robinson & Somerville, Birmingham, Ala., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

ACKER, District Judge.

On March 13, 1984, this court denied Searle's motion for summary judgment as to two of plaintiffs' claims or causes of action, the first based on an alleged breach of an implied warranty and the second based on Searle's alleged wilful or wanton conduct in that Searle is charged with continuing to market the IUD after notice of its dangerous propensities. After further discovery, Searle has now refiled its motion...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases