BOYLES v. BOYLES

No. 8310SC1089.

319 S.E.2d 923 (1984)

Alma Christine BOYLES v. Paul W. BOYLES.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 18, 1984.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DeBank, McDaniel, Heidgerd, Holbrook & Anderson by Douglas F. DeBank, Raleigh, for plaintiff-appellee.

Sanford, Adams, McCullough & Beard by Charles H. Montgomery and Nancy H. Hemphill, Cary, for defendant-appellant.


HILL, Judge.

Defendant Paul W. Boyles brings forth six assignments of error concerning instructions to the jury, rulings on motions for directed verdicts, and rulings on testimonial objections. We have examined each of the assignments and find no basis for reversal.

Defendant first contends that because defendant pled and presented evidence by which he attempted to show that plaintiff had waived her right to alimony, the trial

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases